EFA has issued an analysis of Labor’s recently announced scheme. We conclude that mandatory ISP filtering would not be effective in protecting children. PC based filtering remains more effective. Our analysis includes information about why that is so. Kim Beazley appears to have latched onto an ineffective and unworkable proposal issued by The Australia Institute 3 years ago and further promoted by the Family First Party 18 months ago. According to recent research commissioned by the Australian Internet safety advisory body, NetAlert, mandatory ISP filtering would still not be effective in protecting children and would lead to a significant reduction in network performance.
See also:
EFA’s Time Line of Mandatory ISP Filtering Proposals and Religious Right Group’s lobbying campaigns, 2003-2006.
Related Items:
- Protecting Children’s Privacy from Big Tech and Media Giants 23 September 2023
- What Are The RES / DIS Codes And Why Do They Matter? 18 July 2023
- Vale Geordie Guy 10 August 2024
- Supporting Families, Protecting Privacy: Why a… 10 September 2024
- EFA Calls for Urgent Legislative Action on AI Safety… 26 March 2025