
EFA is disappointed that the Attorney-General has ignored the major threats to freedom of expression in Australia in framing the terms of reference for the parliamentary inquiry he announced today.
The extremely narrow terms of reference for this inquiry mean that it is not ‘an inquiry into freedom of speech’ as the Attorney’s media release claims.
There are many serious threats to free expression in 21st century Australia, including our archaic and inconsistent defamation laws, section 35P of the ASIO Act, censorship of the Internet and the chilling effects of mass surveillance.
EFA Executive Officer Jon Lawrence said today, “if the Attorney wants to call his inquiry one into ‘freedom of speech’ then he needs to include the major threats to free expression in the terms of reference. The issues around section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act hardly qualify as major threats to free expression.”
Related Items:
- EFA's submission to rushed inquiry into the Online… 24 November 2024
- Submission: Proposed Online Safety Bill 2021 11 May 2023
- EFA Highlights Significant Risks of New Internet Law 14 February 2024
- Facebook’s Actions Highlight Flaws of Digital Platforms Code 18 February 2021
- Electronic Frontiers Australia Demands Urgent Privacy Reform 12 September 2024